Assessing End of Life Communication in Intensive Care Patients Using Conceptual Framework and Quality Indicators

End of Life Communication

Authors

  • P.A. Tammy Pham Shared Health Manitoba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5203/jcanpa.v1i3.779

Keywords:

End of Life Communication

Abstract

Most deaths in Canada occur in hospitals, and almost one in five occurs in intensive care units (ICUs). The goal of this study is to assess the quality of end-of-life (EOL) communication in two important groups in intensive care in Winnipeg: (i) those who live in personal care homes (PCH) and (ii) those with severe cardiovascular and/or respiratory failure placed on an artificial life support called extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Two domains of EOL communication were studied: Goals of Care Discussion (GOCD) and Documentation. We used a validated conceptual framework for the quality of EOL communication and documentation, operationalized by 18 specific quality indicators (QIs). We performed a retrospective, manual review of hospital charts (107 charts from the PCH subgroup and 103 charts from the ECMO subgroup) to extract these QIs. Overall, the quality of EOL communication and documentation was low. Despite the ECMO cohort being the sicker group with worse in-hospital mortality rates, the quality of EOL communication was significantly worse compared to PCH group. Quality of EOL communication was highly influenced by patient physiologic status adjusted for age, sex, year of admission, disease category, socioeconomic quintile and urban status.

Author Biography

P.A. Tammy Pham, Shared Health Manitoba

Recent graduate of the University of Manitoba MPAS program

References

1. Statistics Canada. Deaths in Hospital and Elsewhere, Canada, provinces and territories. 2015.
2. Heyland DK, Lavery J V, Tranmer JE, Shortt SE, Taylor SJ. Dying in Canada: is it an institutionalized, technologically supported experience? J Palliat Care [Internet]. 2000 Oct [cited 2017 Nov 27];16 Suppl:S10-6. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11075528
3. Bekelman JE, Halpern SD, Blankart CR, Bynum JP, Cohen J, Fowler R, et al. Comparison of Site of Death, Health Care Utilization, and Hospital Expenditures for Patients Dying With Cancer in 7 Developed Countries. JAMA [Internet]. 2016 Jan 19 [cited 2017 Nov 27];315(3):272. Available from: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.2015.18603
4. DeCaria K, Dudgeon D, Green E, Moxam RS, Rahal R, Niu J, et al. Acute care
hospitalization near the end of life for cancer patients who die in hospital in Canada. Curr
Oncol [Internet]. 2017 Aug 31 [cited 2017 Nov 27];24(4):256–61. Available from: http://www.current-oncology.com/index.php/oncology/article/view/3704/2510
5. Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2017 Nov 27];2010(340):c1345. Available from:
http://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/340/bmj.c1345.full.pdf
6. Winnipeg Regional Health Authority. Advance Care Planning Policy - Goals of Care [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2019 Apr 27]. Available from:http://www.wrha.mb.ca/professionals/acp/index.php

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2019-10-18

How to Cite

Pham, P. T. (2019). Assessing End of Life Communication in Intensive Care Patients Using Conceptual Framework and Quality Indicators: End of Life Communication. The Journal of Canada’s Physician Assistants, 1(3), Annex 7. https://doi.org/10.5203/jcanpa.v1i3.779