Perceptions of Underrepresentation Among Students in STEM Fields: An Empirical Analysis
Gender bias in science has been thoroughly researched and it is well known that women are underrepresented withinÂ post-secondary Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (herein stem) programs. Limiting womenâ€™s participationÂ in science carries heavy consequences for both the economy and scientific community. Therefore, gender inequality must beÂ addressed with urgency. This research is focused on the following research questions: 1) are there gender differences in howÂ students perceive the underrepresentation of women in stem; 2) are there gender differences in student support for initiativesÂ that could enhance gender equity in stem? Not surprisingly, the results suggest that women consider proportionate genderÂ representation to be more important than men (61.9% vs. 39.6%; Ï‡ 2 [2, 158]=7.05, p=0.029, Cramerâ€™s V=0.211). Further,Â when considering their own experiences, 20% of female respondents reported feeling underrepresented at university. TheseÂ perceptions were more common among women studying stem subjects than other subjects (33% vs. 14%; Ï‡ 2 (1, 339)=16.9,Â p<0.001, Cramerâ€™s V=0.22). Women expressed a greater level of support than men for many programs that would addressÂ this issue and a greater level of interest in participating in them. This interest was heightened among women who felt underrepresented. This suggests that women desire opportunities to connect with like peers through outreach and mentorshipÂ programs. These solutions require increased levels of resources, as well as the cooperation of those who do not identify asÂ underrepresented individuals. Post-secondary institutions should consider this as they develop new ways of addressing thisÂ issue.
Copyright (c) 2018 D. Saj, A. Farenhorst, T. Peter
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Proceedings of Manitoba's Undergraduate Science and Engineering Research by University of Manitoba is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The authors hold the copyright to published articles without restriction, and retain publishing rights.Â